• Welcome Guest
  • white bg

Search Results for: 'accreditation-for-biobanking-facilities-brochure'

Facts & Figures

  ILAC’s international network of members consists of organisations from a diversity of global economies. These members include signatories to the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA), Associates, Stakeholders and Regional Cooperation Bodies.   Since the formation of the ILAC MRA in 2000, the number of accreditation body members from around the world has more than

Evaluation Process

Acceptance of an accreditation body into the ILAC MRA is dependent upon being successfully evaluated by peers from other accreditation bodies in accordance with the relevant rules and procedures contained in ILAC publications. Each accreditation body that is a signatory to the ILAC MRA commits to: Maintain conformity with the current version of ISO/IEC 17011

Member News

This page contains links to the online newsletters of regional bodies and information on how to access Accreditation Body (AB) newsletters. If you belong to a regional body and would like your newsletter page listed here, please contact ILAC. REGIONAL AFRAC (African Accreditation Cooperation) News APAC (Asia Pacific Accreditation Cooperation Incorporated) News ARAC (Arab Accreditation Cooperation) News

ILAC – BIPM Partnership

  ILAC has a long-standing relationship with the International Bureau for Weights and Measures (BIPM). Further information on the ILAC liaison activity with the BIPM is available from the members area of the ILAC website.   Joint CIPM-ILAC Webinar: Digital Transformation in the context of Accreditation The CIPM-ILAC Webinar titled: Digital Transformation in the context

Information for Regulators

is an important and effective tool for government and regulators around the world to be aware of and use in the acceptance of data and results from accredited laboratories and inspection bodies that have carried out calibration, testing, medical testing and inspection work, or who mandate participation in proficiency testing programs or the use of

ILAC – WADA Partnership

  ILAC and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) have a long-standing relationship. Accreditation of anti-doping laboratories by an ILAC MRA signatory is a pre-requisite for WADA accreditation.ILAC and WADA work together to formally recognise the technical competence of the anti-doping laboratories and this then leads to community confidence in laboratory outputs which are measurement results that are fit for their intended

ILAC – ITU Partnership

Memorandum of Understanding The International Telecommunications Union (ITU), the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) and the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) have reviewed and re-signed the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) from May 2012. The re-signing of the ITU-IAF-ILAC MoU continues to support and strengthen the three organizations’ commitment to cooperation and collaboration and the ongoing development

ILAC – IAF Partnership

  ILAC and the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) have been co-operating since 2001 to achieve improved alignment of their work programmes as this contributes to the effectiveness and efficiency of both organisations, their mutual members and delivery of value to their stakeholders. This is an effective and well established partnership that now includes joint meetings

Benefits

The MRA supports international trade by promoting international confidence and acceptance of accredited testing and inspection reports, proficiency testing program provisions and reference material producers. Technical barriers to trade, such as the retesting of products each time they enter a new economy is reduced. In this way, the free-trade goal of “accredited once, accepted everywhere”

Membership Criteria

Regional Cooperation Bodies Full Members (ILAC MRA Signatories) Associates Stakeholders Regional Cooperation Bodies Formally established regional accreditation cooperations having objectives similar to and compatible with ILAC, which are committed to the obligations of the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement and which consist of formally nominated representatives of the accreditation interests from at least four economies. Recognised Regional

 

1 2 3 4 5