Search Results for: 'proficiency-testing-workshop-hosted-by-eurachem'
Documents and information published by external organisations that relate to accreditation A wide variety of organisations, many of whom work closely with ILAC, publish documents and information relating to accreditation, calibration, testing, inspection, proficiency testing and reference material activities. The range of topics includes technical guides for specific sector areas such as microbiological or chemical
Below is a selection of videos addressing various aspects of accreditation including definitions, importance in the delivery of competent conformity assessment activities as well as its role in the overall quality infrastructure for economies. Additional videos are available from the IAF/ILAC YouTube channel. Accreditation Supporting the SDGs During COVID-19 The United Nations Industrial Development Organization
Below is a list of ILAC documents that have been withdrawn. ILAC G9:2005 Guidelines for the Selection and Use of Reference Materials Please note: ISO Guide 33:2015 Reference materials – Good practice in using reference materials replaces ILAC G9 and is available here ILAC P11:09/2009 Monitoring Performance of ILAC Evaluators The procedure for monitoring the performance of
The contact details for the international bodies ILAC liaises and cooperates with are provided below. APMP Asia/Pacific Metrology Programme Tel: +81 298 61 4363 Fax: +81 298 61 4393 Email: momoyo-homma@aist.go.jp Website: https://metrologyasiapacific.com/ ASEAN Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Tel: +6221 7262991 Fax: +6221 7398234 Email: public@asean.org Website: https://asean.org/ COOMET Euro-Asian Cooperation Of National
Remote Survey Data – A joint IAF/ILAC/ISO survey on the use of remote assessment techniques has shown that a large majority prefer remote or blended audits, assessments and/or evaluations. Furthermore, respondents felt that remote activities provide as much confidence as on-site activities and would like to see continued or an increased use of remote activities
Memorandum of Understanding The International Telecommunications Union (ITU), the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) and the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) have reviewed and re-signed the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) from May 2012. The re-signing of the ITU-IAF-ILAC MoU continues to support and strengthen the three organizations’ commitment to cooperation and collaboration and the ongoing development
ILAC and the International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML) have a long standing relationship. Memorandum of Understanding The Joint ILAC-IAF-OIML Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed on 08 February, 2024. Joint Assessments The Joint ILAC-OIML Assessment Procedure in the field of legal metrology was published in February 2018. Joint Declarations Metrological
Regional Cooperation Bodies Full Members (ILAC MRA Signatories) Associates Stakeholders Regional Cooperation Bodies Formally established regional accreditation cooperations having objectives similar to and compatible with ILAC, which are committed to the obligations of the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement and which consist of formally nominated representatives of the accreditation interests from at least four economies. Recognised Regional
ILAC Guidance documents for accreditation bodies and accredited organisations may provide information on the interpretation of accreditation criteria for specific applications. These guidelines have been prepared to assist accreditation bodies to set up training courses that are in line with international practice and which will enable them to generate the lead assessors and technical assessors
How Accreditation Supports the Needs of Global Regulators Global arrangements through ILAC and IAF underpin the international acceptance of traded products. Through accredited sources, economic operators can demonstrate that their products meet market requirements so that market operations can use these products with confidence. This system also enables governments to regulate products in the knowledge
<< Previous
1
2
3
Next >>
